Comparison
Trading 212 vs Tradu
Two crypto exchanges compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.
Recent coverage
Press we captured in the last 90 days: 2 for Trading 212, 2 for Tradu. Not scored - coverage volume says how often a brand is written about, not whether it is doing well.
- Trading 212 let UK retail trade crypto ETNs without FCA approval: FTtradingview.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Trading 212 sold crypto ETNs to UK retail investors without FCA authorisation - FTfinextra.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Trading 212 Relaunches Cryptogoodmoneyguide.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Weekly Recap: FXCM, Tradu to Slash 100+ Jobs; 1/3 of eToro Trades Now in 24/5 Extended Market Hoursfinancemagnates.com · Dec 13, 2025
- Weekly Recap: FXCM, Tradu to Slash 100+ Jobs; 1/3 of eToro Trades Now in 24/5 Extended Market Hourstradingview.com · Dec 12, 2025
- Exclusive: Tradu, FXCM to Cut Over 100 Jobs Amid Cost Pressuresfinancemagnates.com · Dec 8, 2025
Trading 212 vs Tradu: the verdict
Trading 212 and Tradu are two crypto exchanges tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure - customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.
Trading 212 leads NeoBase's composite sentiment score, 92.2 to 81.2 out of 100.
Trading 212 holds the stronger app-store ratings across Google Play and the App Store.
Trading 212 draws fewer bottom-scored reviews: 3.2% of its Trustpilot ratings are one star, against 13.4% for Tradu.
Trading 212 is MiCA-authorised (CySEC), while Tradu does not appear in the ESMA register.
Across 7 tracked metrics, Trading 212 comes out ahead on 6.
NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.