Comparison

HappyCoins vs Trading 212

Two crypto exchanges compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.

Best on sentiment
Tie
Best on ratings
HappyCoins
Best on app quality
Trading 212
Best on review volume
Trading 212
Best on regulation
Trading 212
HappyCoins
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View HappyCoins →
Trading 212
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Trading 212 →
Customer sentiment
NeoBase sentiment
92
93
App & store ratings
Trustpilot
5.0
1,392 ratings
BEST
4.6
98,149 ratings
Google Play
4.7
256,367 ratings
BEST
Total ratings
1.4K
355K
BEST
Company
Founded
2004
Country
🇳🇱 NL
🇨🇾 CY
MiCA regulation
MiCA licence
Yes
Yes
BEST
Regulator
AFM
CySEC
Licensed services
3 services
4 services
BEST

HappyCoins vs Trading 212: the verdict

HappyCoins and Trading 212 are two crypto exchanges tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure — customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.

Both score around 92 out of 100 on NeoBase's composite sentiment index.

Trading 212 holds the stronger app-store ratings across Google Play and the App Store.

Both are authorised under the EU's MiCA regime and appear in the ESMA register.

Across 5 tracked metrics, Trading 212 comes out ahead on 4.

How is the winner decided?
For each metric we take the higher value — the higher NeoBase sentiment score, the higher store rating, more ratings, and MiCA authorisation over none. Missing data is not counted.
Where does the data come from?
Ratings and sentiment are aggregated from Trustpilot, Google Play and the App Store; regulation from the official ESMA MiCA register. Scores update weekly.
Can I compare other {type}?
Yes — open any two {type} profiles from the directory to build a side-by-side comparison.

← All crypto exchanges

NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.