Comparison
Deblock vs Trading 212
Two crypto exchanges compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.
Recent coverage
Press we captured in the last 90 days: 0 for Deblock, 2 for Trading 212. Not scored - coverage volume says how often a brand is written about, not whether it is doing well.
- How Deblock Builds Europe's First Onchain Bank & Grew To 300K Userscoingecko.com · Apr 10, 2026
- Deblock introduces a 4% paid current accountadnews.galitt.com · Mar 18, 2026
- Deblock Raises €30M Series A to Scale On-Chain Banking Model, Targeting Germany Expansionventureburn.com · Nov 19, 2025
- Trading 212 sold crypto ETNs to UK retail investors without FCA authorisation - FTfinextra.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Trading 212 let UK retail trade crypto ETNs without FCA approval: FTtradingview.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Trading 212 Offered Crypto Products in the UK Without FCA Approval: Reportfinancemagnates.com · Jan 27, 2026
Deblock vs Trading 212: the verdict
Deblock and Trading 212 are two crypto exchanges tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure - customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.
Deblock leads NeoBase's composite sentiment score, 94.8 to 93.3 out of 100.
Trading 212 answers 100% of the reviews it receives; Deblock answers 26%.
Both are authorised under the EU's MiCA regime and appear in the ESMA register.
Across 8 tracked metrics, Trading 212 comes out ahead on 7.
NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.