Comparison

Amnis vs Chime

Two neobanks compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.

Best on sentiment
Chime
Best on ratings
Chime
Best on app quality
Chime
Best on review volume
Chime
Amnis
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Amnis →
Chime
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Chime →
Customer sentiment
NeoBase sentiment
86.6
88.7
BEST
App & store ratings
Trustpilot
4.2 ★
232 ratings
BEST
3.5 ★
13,882 ratings
Google Play
4.2 ★
13 ratings
4.7 ★
1,128,783 ratings
BEST
App Store
4.7 ★
9 ratings
4.8 ★
1,619,195 ratings
BEST
Total ratings
254
2.8M
BEST
Service & responsiveness
1-star reviews
4%
2.7%
BEST
Replies to reviews
89%
BEST
80%
Typical reply time
~7 days
-
Markets served
5
BEST
1
Company
Founded
-
2012
Country
🇨🇭 Switzerland
🇺🇸 United States
Headquarters
-
San Francisco, USA

Recent coverage

Press we captured in the last 90 days: 0 for Amnis, 34 for Chime. Not scored - coverage volume says how often a brand is written about, not whether it is doing well.

Amnis
Chime

Amnis vs Chime: the verdict

Amnis and Chime are two neobanks tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure - customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.

Chime leads NeoBase's composite sentiment score, 88.7 to 86.6 out of 100.

Chime holds the stronger app-store ratings across Google Play and the App Store.

Across 8 tracked metrics, Chime comes out ahead on 5.

How is the winner decided?
For each metric we take the higher value - the higher NeoBase sentiment score, the higher store rating, more ratings, and MiCA authorisation over none. Missing data is not counted.
Where does the data come from?
Ratings and sentiment are aggregated from Trustpilot, Google Play and the App Store; regulation from the official ESMA MiCA register. Scores update every month.
Can I compare other {type}?
Yes - open any two {type} profiles from the directory to build a side-by-side comparison.

← All neobanks

NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.