Comparison

Starling Bank vs Varo Bank

Two neobanks compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.

Best on sentiment
Starling Bank
Best on ratings
Tie
Best on app quality
Tie
Best on review volume
Starling Bank
Starling Bank
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Starling Bank →
Varo Bank
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Varo Bank →
Customer sentiment
NeoBase sentiment
95.7
BEST
94.6
App & store ratings
Trustpilot
4.3
47,749 ratings
BEST
4.0
5,670 ratings
Google Play
4.8
138,561 ratings
-
App Store
4.9
621,732 ratings
4.9
233,487 ratings
Total ratings
808K
BEST
239K
Service & responsiveness
1-star reviews
2.1%
1.8%
Replies to reviews
97%
BEST
88%
Typical reply time
~12 hours
BEST
~5 days
Markets served
1
1
Company
Founded
2014
-
Country
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
🇺🇸 United States
Headquarters
London, UK
-

Recent coverage

Press we captured in the last 90 days: 16 for Starling Bank, 2 for Varo Bank. Not scored - coverage volume says how often a brand is written about, not whether it is doing well.

Starling Bank
Varo Bank

Starling Bank vs Varo Bank: the verdict

Starling Bank and Varo Bank are two neobanks tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure - customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.

Starling Bank leads NeoBase's composite sentiment score, 95.7 to 94.6 out of 100.

Across 5 tracked metrics, Starling Bank comes out ahead on 5.

How is the winner decided?
For each metric we take the higher value - the higher NeoBase sentiment score, the higher store rating, more ratings, and MiCA authorisation over none. Missing data is not counted.
Where does the data come from?
Ratings and sentiment are aggregated from Trustpilot, Google Play and the App Store; regulation from the official ESMA MiCA register. Scores update every month.
Can I compare other {type}?
Yes - open any two {type} profiles from the directory to build a side-by-side comparison.

← All neobanks

NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.