Comparison
Cryptosmart vs Trading 212
Two crypto exchanges compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.
Recent coverage
Press we captured in the last 90 days: 0 for Cryptosmart, 2 for Trading 212. Not scored - coverage volume says how often a brand is written about, not whether it is doing well.
- Cryptosmart acquires IBX and makes a €3.5 million capital increasestartupbusiness.it · Apr 15, 2024
- Trading 212 sold crypto ETNs to UK retail investors without FCA authorisation - FTfinextra.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Trading 212 let UK retail trade crypto ETNs without FCA approval: FTtradingview.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Trading 212 Offered Crypto Products in the UK Without FCA Approval: Reportfinancemagnates.com · Jan 27, 2026
Cryptosmart vs Trading 212: the verdict
Cryptosmart and Trading 212 are two crypto exchanges tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure - customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.
Trading 212 leads NeoBase's composite sentiment score, 93.3 to 77.0 out of 100.
Trading 212 holds the stronger app-store ratings across Google Play and the App Store.
Trading 212 draws fewer bottom-scored reviews: 2.9% of its Trustpilot ratings are one star, against 17.1% for Cryptosmart.
Trading 212 answers 100% of the reviews it receives; Cryptosmart answers 0%.
Both are authorised under the EU's MiCA regime and appear in the ESMA register.
Across 8 tracked metrics, Trading 212 comes out ahead on 6.
NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.