Comparison

Aidexa vs Atom Bank

Two neobanks compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.

Best on sentiment
Atom Bank
Best on ratings
Atom Bank
Best on review volume
Atom Bank
Aidexa
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Aidexa →
Atom Bank
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Atom Bank →
Customer sentiment
NeoBase sentiment
76.7
96.6
BEST
App & store ratings
Trustpilot
4.1
1,438 ratings
4.8
21,332 ratings
BEST
Google Play
-
4.8
19,837 ratings
App Store
-
4.8
69,521 ratings
Total ratings
1.4K
111K
BEST
Service & responsiveness
1-star reviews
19.4%
1.7%
BEST
Replies to reviews
93%
BEST
86%
Typical reply time
~1 week
BEST
~1 week
Markets served
1
1
Company
Founded
-
2013
Country
🇮🇹 Italy
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
Headquarters
-
Durham, United Kingdom

Recent coverage

Press we captured in the last 90 days: 2 for Aidexa, 10 for Atom Bank. Not scored - coverage volume says how often a brand is written about, not whether it is doing well.

Aidexa
Atom Bank

Aidexa vs Atom Bank: the verdict

Aidexa and Atom Bank are two neobanks tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure - customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.

Atom Bank leads NeoBase's composite sentiment score, 96.6 to 76.7 out of 100.

Atom Bank draws fewer bottom-scored reviews: 1.7% of its Trustpilot ratings are one star, against 19.4% for Aidexa.

Across 6 tracked metrics, Atom Bank comes out ahead on 4.

How is the winner decided?
For each metric we take the higher value - the higher NeoBase sentiment score, the higher store rating, more ratings, and MiCA authorisation over none. Missing data is not counted.
Where does the data come from?
Ratings and sentiment are aggregated from Trustpilot, Google Play and the App Store; regulation from the official ESMA MiCA register. Scores update every month.
Can I compare other {type}?
Yes - open any two {type} profiles from the directory to build a side-by-side comparison.

← All neobanks

NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.