Comparison
Trading 212 vs ZBX
Two crypto exchanges compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.
Recent coverage
Press we captured in the last 90 days: 2 for Trading 212, 0 for ZBX. Not scored - coverage volume says how often a brand is written about, not whether it is doing well.
- Trading 212 let UK retail trade crypto ETNs without FCA approval: FTtradingview.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Trading 212 sold crypto ETNs to UK retail investors without FCA authorisation - FTfinextra.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Trading 212 Relaunches Cryptogoodmoneyguide.com · Jan 27, 2026
- ZBX Revolutionizes Financial Services in Hong Kong with Web 3.0 Debit Card Conceptprnewswire.co.uk · May 31, 2023
- Interview with ZBX, a top 5 exchange based in Maltaen.cryptonomist.ch · Nov 1, 2018
Trading 212 vs ZBX: the verdict
Trading 212 and ZBX are two crypto exchanges tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure - customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.
Trading 212 leads NeoBase's composite sentiment score, 92.2 to 47.9 out of 100.
Trading 212 holds the stronger app-store ratings across Google Play and the App Store.
Trading 212 draws fewer bottom-scored reviews: 3.2% of its Trustpilot ratings are one star, against 51.4% for ZBX.
Trading 212 answers 100% of the reviews it receives; ZBX answers 0%.
Both are authorised under the EU's MiCA regime and appear in the ESMA register.
Across 8 tracked metrics, Trading 212 comes out ahead on 6.
NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.