Comparison
Trading 212 vs WhiteBIT
Two crypto exchanges compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.
Recent coverage
Press we captured in the last 90 days: 2 for Trading 212, 16 for WhiteBIT. Not scored - coverage volume says how often a brand is written about, not whether it is doing well.
- Trading 212 sold crypto ETNs to UK retail investors without FCA authorisation - FTfinextra.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Trading 212 let UK retail trade crypto ETNs without FCA approval: FTtradingview.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Trading 212 Offered Crypto Products in the UK Without FCA Approval: Reportfinancemagnates.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Shadow exchangers and crypto wallets: "KIT Group" and WhiteBIT figure in a case of laundering millions from the drug tradeantikor.info · Sep 14, 2026
- WhiteBIT's Nosov: from bear market to W Groupthepaypers.com · Sep 13, 2026
- WhiteBIT OTC Crypto Exchange: How Large Trades Work Outside the Order Bookon-magazine.co.uk · Sep 12, 2026
Trading 212 vs WhiteBIT: the verdict
Trading 212 and WhiteBIT are two crypto exchanges tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure - customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.
Trading 212 leads NeoBase's composite sentiment score, 93.3 to 48.3 out of 100.
Trading 212 holds the stronger app-store ratings across Google Play and the App Store.
Trading 212 draws fewer bottom-scored reviews: 2.9% of its Trustpilot ratings are one star, against 33.6% for WhiteBIT.
Both are authorised under the EU's MiCA regime and appear in the ESMA register.
Across 8 tracked metrics, Trading 212 comes out ahead on 6.
NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.