Comparison

Cora vs Revolut

Two neobanks compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.

Best on sentiment
Tie
Best on ratings
Tie
Best on app quality
Tie
Best on review volume
Revolut
Cora
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Cora →
Revolut
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Revolut →
Customer sentiment
NeoBase sentiment
95
94
App & store ratings
Trustpilot
3.6
2 ratings
4.7
435,438 ratings
BEST
Google Play
4.8
108,017 ratings
BEST
4.7
4,061,780 ratings
App Store
4.7
14,242 ratings
4.9
1,052,348 ratings
BEST
Total ratings
122K
5.5M
BEST
Service & responsiveness
1-star reviews
2.9%
BEST
3.6%
Replies to reviews
0%
61%
BEST
Typical reply time
-
~19 hours
Markets served
1
40
BEST
Company
Founded
-
2015
Country
🇧🇷 Brazil
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
Headquarters
São Paulo, Brazil
London, United Kingdom

Recent coverage

Press we captured in the last 90 days: 8 for Cora, 25 for Revolut. Not scored - coverage volume says how often a brand is written about, not whether it is doing well.

Cora
Revolut

Cora vs Revolut: the verdict

Cora and Revolut are two neobanks tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure - customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.

Both score around 95 out of 100 on NeoBase's composite sentiment index.

Revolut answers 61% of the reviews it receives; Cora answers 0%.

Across 7 tracked metrics, Revolut comes out ahead on 5.

How is the winner decided?
For each metric we take the higher value - the higher NeoBase sentiment score, the higher store rating, more ratings, and MiCA authorisation over none. Missing data is not counted.
Where does the data come from?
Ratings and sentiment are aggregated from Trustpilot, Google Play and the App Store; regulation from the official ESMA MiCA register. Scores update every two weeks.
Can I compare other {type}?
Yes - open any two {type} profiles from the directory to build a side-by-side comparison.

← All neobanks

NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.