Comparison

Atom Bank vs Cora

Two neobanks compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.

Best on sentiment
Tie
Best on ratings
Tie
Best on app quality
Tie
Best on review volume
Cora
Atom Bank
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Atom Bank →
Cora
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Cora →
Customer sentiment
NeoBase sentiment
96
96
App & store ratings
Trustpilot
4.8
20,869 ratings
BEST
3.6
2 ratings
Google Play
4.7
19,704 ratings
4.8
107,991 ratings
BEST
App Store
4.8
69,098 ratings
BEST
4.7
14,234 ratings
Total ratings
110K
122K
BEST
Service & responsiveness
1-star reviews
2.3%
0%
BEST
Replies to reviews
95%
BEST
0%
Typical reply time
~6 days
-
Markets served
1
1
Company
Founded
2013
-
Country
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
🇧🇷 Brazil
Headquarters
Durham, United Kingdom
São Paulo, Brazil

Recent coverage

Press we captured in the last 90 days: 8 for Atom Bank, 8 for Cora. Not scored - coverage volume says how often a brand is written about, not whether it is doing well.

Atom Bank
Cora

Atom Bank vs Cora: the verdict

Atom Bank and Cora are two neobanks tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure - customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.

Both score around 96 out of 100 on NeoBase's composite sentiment index.

Atom Bank answers 95% of the reviews it receives; Cora answers 0%.

The two are evenly matched - each leads on the same number of tracked metrics.

How is the winner decided?
For each metric we take the higher value - the higher NeoBase sentiment score, the higher store rating, more ratings, and MiCA authorisation over none. Missing data is not counted.
Where does the data come from?
Ratings and sentiment are aggregated from Trustpilot, Google Play and the App Store; regulation from the official ESMA MiCA register. Scores update weekly.
Can I compare other {type}?
Yes - open any two {type} profiles from the directory to build a side-by-side comparison.

← All neobanks

NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.