Comparison

Accountable vs Acorns

Two neobanks compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.

Best on sentiment
Tie
Best on ratings
Acorns
Best on app quality
Acorns
Best on review volume
Acorns
Accountable
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Accountable →
Acorns
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Acorns →
Customer sentiment
NeoBase sentiment
93.3
94.2
App & store ratings
Trustpilot
4.6 ★
1,139 ratings
BEST
4.0 ★
4,377 ratings
Google Play
4.6 ★
5,279 ratings
4.7 ★
412,563 ratings
BEST
App Store
4.7 ★
6,183 ratings
4.8 ★
959,646 ratings
BEST
Total ratings
13K
1.4M
BEST
Service & responsiveness
1-star reviews
2.5%
2.4%
Replies to reviews
96%
98%
BEST
Typical reply time
~4 weeks
~4 days
BEST
Markets served
3
BEST
1
Company
Founded
-
2012
Country
-
🇺🇸 United States
Headquarters
-
Irvine, California, USA

Recent coverage

Press we captured in the last 90 days: 2 for Accountable, 1 for Acorns. Not scored - coverage volume says how often a brand is written about, not whether it is doing well.

Accountable
Acorns

Accountable vs Acorns: the verdict

Accountable and Acorns are two neobanks tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure - customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.

Both score around 93.3 out of 100 on NeoBase's composite sentiment index.

Acorns holds the stronger app-store ratings across Google Play and the App Store.

Across 7 tracked metrics, Acorns comes out ahead on 5.

How is the winner decided?
For each metric we take the higher value - the higher NeoBase sentiment score, the higher store rating, more ratings, and MiCA authorisation over none. Missing data is not counted.
Where does the data come from?
Ratings and sentiment are aggregated from Trustpilot, Google Play and the App Store; regulation from the official ESMA MiCA register. Scores update every month.
Can I compare other {type}?
Yes - open any two {type} profiles from the directory to build a side-by-side comparison.

← All neobanks

NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.