Comparison
NAGA vs Trading 212
Two crypto exchanges compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.
Recent coverage
Press we captured in the last 90 days: 10 for NAGA, 2 for Trading 212. Not scored - coverage volume says how often a brand is written about, not whether it is doing well.
- FX week in review: Brex Capital launch, Robinhood UK crypto approval, NAGA results, CFDs broker loses licensefxnewsgroup.com · Aug 10, 2026
- The NAGA Group Reports Preliminary H1 2026 Results on 5 August 2026 – Invitation to Earnings Webcast/Call on the Same Daytradingview.com · Jul 25, 2026
- NAGA SECURES MICA AUTHORIZATION FOR CRYPTO-ASSET SERVICES ACROSS THE EUtradingview.com · Jul 15, 2026
- Trading 212 let UK retail trade crypto ETNs without FCA approval: FTtradingview.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Trading 212 sold crypto ETNs to UK retail investors without FCA authorisation - FTfinextra.com · Jan 27, 2026
- Trading 212 Relaunches Cryptogoodmoneyguide.com · Jan 27, 2026
NAGA vs Trading 212: the verdict
NAGA and Trading 212 are two crypto exchanges tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure - customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.
Trading 212 leads NeoBase's composite sentiment score, 92.2 to 59.3 out of 100.
Trading 212 draws fewer bottom-scored reviews: 3.2% of its Trustpilot ratings are one star, against 14.1% for NAGA.
Trading 212 answers 100% of the reviews it receives; NAGA answers 0%.
Both are authorised under the EU's MiCA regime and appear in the ESMA register.
Across 7 tracked metrics, Trading 212 comes out ahead on 5.
NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.