Comparison

Cash App vs Cora

Two neobanks compared on customer sentiment, app-store ratings and regulation.

Best on sentiment
Tie
Best on ratings
Tie
Best on app quality
Tie
Best on review volume
Cash App
Cash App
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Cash App →
Cora
sentiment
Google Play
App Store
Trustpilot
View Cora →
Customer sentiment
NeoBase sentiment
93.4
94.0
App & store ratings
Trustpilot
4.5
27,792 ratings
BEST
3.6
2 ratings
Google Play
4.7
4,440,051 ratings
4.8
108,416 ratings
BEST
App Store
4.8
8,693,372 ratings
BEST
4.7
14,302 ratings
Total ratings
13.2M
BEST
123K
Service & responsiveness
1-star reviews
2.3%
BEST
3.2%
Replies to reviews
84%
BEST
0%
Typical reply time
< 1h
-
Markets served
2
BEST
1
Company
Founded
2013
-
Country
🇺🇸 United States
🇧🇷 Brazil
Headquarters
-
São Paulo, Brazil

Recent coverage

Press we captured in the last 90 days: 15 for Cash App, 1 for Cora. Not scored - coverage volume says how often a brand is written about, not whether it is doing well.

Cash App
Cora

Cash App vs Cora: the verdict

Cash App and Cora are two neobanks tracked by NeoBase. Here is how they compare across the signals we measure - customer sentiment, store ratings and, for exchanges, MiCA regulation.

Both score around 93.4 out of 100 on NeoBase's composite sentiment index.

Cash App answers 84% of the reviews it receives; Cora answers 0%.

Across 7 tracked metrics, Cash App comes out ahead on 6.

How is the winner decided?
For each metric we take the higher value - the higher NeoBase sentiment score, the higher store rating, more ratings, and MiCA authorisation over none. Missing data is not counted.
Where does the data come from?
Ratings and sentiment are aggregated from Trustpilot, Google Play and the App Store; regulation from the official ESMA MiCA register. Scores update every month.
Can I compare other {type}?
Yes - open any two {type} profiles from the directory to build a side-by-side comparison.

← All neobanks

NeoBase is an independent information platform, not affiliated with the brands compared. Figures are indicative and update over time.